Where to vote and why I’m voting. First, here’s the how to: a link to your poling place where you go to vote. Do it early and prepare some zingers for the exit polling people. Tell them that you are most motived by both the war AND the economy, because they’re the same issue. See if that tiny bit of complex thought registers in the media.
Here’s a primer on Virginia’s primary from the Daily Press.
Below, you’ll find my thinking about the two races (with a surprise ending, stay tuned).
REPUBLICANS:
Although I am diametrically opposed to the Republican platform, I’ve tried my best to pay attention to their machinations. McCain has it locked up, they say. Personally, I’m having trouble seeing how that happened. At age 72, he’s really not very inspiring anymore – barely able to belt out a slogan, much less a stump speech. His days of pushing a reform agenda to the forefront of the Republican party, really seem behind him. I mean, considering all of the backsliding he has done under Bush, who is John McCain anymore? Under his presidency, I think we’d see many of the same faces in his cabinet as we have currently (Iran-Contra insiders and their ilk). McCain no longer projects a strong vision, following his misdirected party, rather than fighting for his principles from within. So, a vote for McCain, is a vote for more of the same, in my opinion.
Now, I understand if people have been voting for McCain this time around because it’s finally his turn and maybe the right wing feels guilty for not having given him a chance while he was young enough to survive a term as president. It’s sort of a tribute send-off in a general election that Republicans know they deserve to lose. So, letting McCain take the hit makes sense, because he’s the ghost of Republican past; what could have been. Why waste Romney on a losing election when his perfect tan still has as decent shelf life? Now, I don’t know how all of them got the memo on this strategy, but it seems like they’ve made the best play, while using this primary season to rearrange the identity of their party. I’m afraid, that McCain’s landslide represents the perspective that everything is going hunky-dory and so, why not vote for the most familiar guy who’s proven he can carry water for party ideologues.
DEMOCRATS:
Back in 1992, I worked on the Clinton campaign in Fairfax County and wore a campaign shirt that said, “Clinton: The Cure for the Blues.” Ever since then, I’ve been slowly backing away from Bill, feeling sorry for Hillary, and wondering if the Democratic party would ever find its spine. Now, I’m glad that Hillary Clinton has transcended the debacle of her public domestic snafu, and took her place in the political history of the US as a leader, independent of her two term president husband. And I’m not one who would begrudge her the presidency because of her relationship to Bill. Nonetheless, Hillary is not the future of the Democratic party. She is too far removed from her own ideals (in bed with big pharma and insurance companies, etc), and her public beatings at the hands of the right wing mark a low point in American politics. Let’s not go there again (as we most certainly would see if she headed up the Dem’s ticket).
When Obama/Clinton showed up in Richmond this weekend, Barack had taken the momentum from Hillary with three Saturday primaries and I found myself ready to post an Obama yard sign out front. I didn’t attend the event. Obama-mania has been a feeling that I’ve felt coming on since Edwards’ campaign failed to get off the ground. I dunno how to put my finger on it, but Obama seems to have a big picture about politics that I don’t think you’ll find in the other candidates. He can and does see disputes from both sides, uses his arguments to straddle the “two Americas” that Edwards talks about, and seems most equipped to repair the damage done by the two Bush terms (and maybe Bill’s mistakes with wellfare reform, etc). Hillary Clinton was too much a part of too many past messes for me to feel excited about her.
The media likes to say that Clinton is “polarizing”, but if that’s true, then Obama is too. Obama/Clinton’s positions on most issues are about the same. So, what’s the difference? It’s almost as if the media just learned this word. Clinton isn’t polarizing. She just inspires negativity (although, I don’t share the common knee jerk reaction about her). Obama is more of a diffuser and a motivator. Not only are these better leadership qualities, they will deliver a bigger margin of victory in the general election. And isn’t that what this whole primary business is about? Putting together a winning ticket?
No. It’s about ideas. Vote your hopes, not your fears, right? That’s what the Nader campaigns of the past always said. The 1000 plus people who attended the Nader speaking event at the Byrd on Sunday would probably attest that he’s got more ideas for changing America for the better than both Democratic candidates put together. But, who’s gonna work with him at this point? As much as I like the guy, I’d rather him focus on informing the grassroots where people can trickle-up their awareness to BOTH parties. In other words, “Ralph, please try a new strategy for the 2008 election.”
Speaking of ideas, here’s one that may be a little half-baked and over-simplified, but I believe it all the same:
RICHMOND NEEDS BARACK OBAMA.
Why? The City of Richmond, a Democratic party stronghold, is divided on racial lines, lives in two (if not more) separate universes, and we desperately need to pull together and find common cause. A black democrat for president can be a catalyst for collaboration – not a panacea – but I believe Barack Obama’s campaign for president can make a difference in the racial dynamic of Richmond. Imagine if Richmonders were all saying “Yes, we can” instead of looking sideways at each other.
Call me a dreamer, but I’m not the only one.
———————————————-
Now that the results are in and Obama has won Virginia with 65% of the votes (more than Clinton, McCain, and Huckabee combined!): I am going to compile some of my favorite local analysis right here:
This is a Comments Mandatory Blog
On Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday, this blog received between 100-120 visits per day. For me, this is exciting. Even better: My most recent post about the VA primary produced an avalanche of comments and has fueled some stimulating (and ongoing) dialog between Richmonders. However, rather than simply rejoicing in increased traffic and the stimulating exchange of ideas, I tend to focus on the voices who are not present and pine for their participation (is that you?). Maybe, my inner busybody just wants to know who’s reading. Yeah, I know, yall have jobs and can’t contribute to every site you peruse. I’m the same way. But, what if you had no choice? What if you had to pledge to leave a thoughtful comment every time you entered a blog or at least leave a rating for the quality/utility of the content?
Welcome to my fantasy: A comments mandatory blog.
When I first saw the debate sparked by Preston Yancy about certain bloggers refusing comments on their sites (overflowing with raw opinions to make you cry, unlike the caramelized variety), my reaction was that it’s a matter of prerogative or personal property. A person’s soapbox is his/her castle. Nuff said. Don’t like it. Don’t read it. However, after laboring over a few posts, receiving minimal feedback, and not feeling content in the act of creation alone, I’m wondering if there is any way to maximize feedback, debate, and discussion. I mean, there is no subscription fee for any of the RVABlogs that I’m aware of. So, how do any of us know if our blog is legitimately popular, an utter disappointment, or a service to the community? Disallowing comments may be the ticket to an insider job under a likewise undemocratic despot, but what about those of us who prefer two-way (or multi-directional) communication? Or better yet, there’s something to be said for just standing back and letting better informed readers fill in the blanks. (JB, I know you can take that ribbing)
Unlike Ebay, where sellers/buyers are critiqued through a reputation system, Craigslist users generally operate on trust in humanity (counterbalanced by a profit motive), despite a high level of vulnerability. Is that what we have to accept as bloggers: that our sentiments are likely to garner minimal unmeasurable returns in the exchange? The democratic system of voting empowers us only so often. Shouldn’t we consider it our obligation to weigh in early and often whenever a public forum is made available? Are you all not as compulsive about this as I am? Okay, some of you are and I wish you’d cease and desist, but attention getting behavior is a double-edged sword, ain’t it?
Opinions are like… blogs. Everyone’s got one. Well, almost.
In reality, blogger traffic in Richmond is really unrepresentative of the City’s population. And then there’s the hard to pin down “unique” visitor factor, which further diminishes our relevance. I mean, does anyone read blogs besides bloggers? I’m beginning to wonder. Can you expect a fellow blogger to chime in on your post if they’ve already got their own soapbox?
Personally, I’m in no position to turn the mandatory comments blog into a reality. I don’t even know how to install the appropriate widgets that would make this site more user friendly. If I had a listing of all of the restaurants mentioned on this site, I’d probably be motivated to get back to the frugal food-blogging idea that gave birth to the RVA Foodie pseudonym and grow that list of eateries.
WILL WORK FOR COMMENTS
Okay, before I trail off into mumbling, I’d like to point out that my unique invention: Grilled Ramen has been the biggest attraction to this site to date (thanks to consistent international traffic from a feature on “the Official Ramen Homepage.“). However, I have not quit my job to retire to the Bahamas thanks to revenues from my tender-crisp creation (cuz there are none to speak of). In fact, as of today, I’ve only attracted 11 comments to that post, and two of them were my own. Using the How much is your blog worth tool, it turns out that Caramelized Opinions is worth $9,597.18. I have no idea what that figure means (how many packages of ramen is that anyway?), or where I might go to cash in, but I’d actually trade every penny of that potential in exchange for your two cents. That’s right. I want to virtually lift every voice in Richmond through this site’s many comment sections.
Has there ever been a more earnest post than this one? I’m sure that I’ve left numerous openings for your criticism, included confounding contradictions, and maybe inspired a few laughs. But, I did it all for the comments. Kid gloves are called for here. But, if your hackles aren’t all the way up, maybe there’s something worth saying in response. You make the call. But remember, if you have 10 thoughts, give one thought, and comment ’til it hurts.
ps: The comment Nazi says, “No blog for you!”